What if every desert installed concentrated solar power (CSP)? [09]

Blanketing the world’s deserts with CSP (solar-thermal + long‑duration thermal storage) is an alluring idea: deserts offer high direct normal irradiance (DNI), vast tracts of land, and low conflicts with agriculture. In theory, a fraction of the Sahara alone could supply global electricity via CSP/solar networks, enabled by HVDC transmission. In practice, CSP plays a strategic, dispatchable niche rather than an all‑purpose solution. PV+battery is now cheapest and fastest to deploy nearly everywhere, whereas CSP’s comparative advantage is hours-to-days of thermal storage, high‑temperature heat for industry, and grid inertia—especially in desert grids where evening peaks and firming needs are acute. CSP capacity and costs are moving, with notable traction in China and continuing operation in Morocco; however, operational challenges and financing headwinds keep it from being the primary renewable globally. For India, select desert CSP hubs in Rajasthan/Gujarat co-located with PV and industry, and aligned with dry cooling and water stewardship, could deliver dispatchable clean power and industrial heat—if pursued as hybrid CSP‑PV‑storage parks with performance‑linked tariffs. [allmultidi...ournal.com], [lerenovaveis.org], [irena.org]

The 2025 energy reality: where CSP sits

Renewables are scaling fast: the world added ~740 GW of renewables in 2024, led by solar PV, with renewables now around 32% of global electricity; but CSP additions remain modest relative to PV and wind. CSP’s LCOE fell sharply in 2024 (‑46% globally per IRENA) but still trails utility PV and onshore wind on average. The value case is dispatchability and system services rather than raw $/MWh. [aenert.com], [irena.org]

Costs: 2024 global weighted-average LCOE—PV $0.043/kWh; onshore wind $0.034/kWh; CSP higher but improving; 91% of new renewable capacity undercut new fossil alternatives. [irena.org], [taiyangnews.info]
Capacity distribution: CSP’s global operational fleet is ~6–7 GW; growth has been concentrated in Spain, Morocco and China, with China now commissioning hybrid CSP‑PV parks and targeting larger pipelines in arid provinces. [energy.gov], [pv-magazine.com]

Why deserts are compelling—and complex—for CSP

1) Resource & land.
CSP requires high DNI (≥2,000 kWh/m²‑yr); deserts meet this criterion, with large, contiguous land far from urban constraints. Typical land intensity is ~40,000 m²/MW and slopes <2–5° depending on CSP type—attributes common in deserts. [courses.ems.psu.edu]

2) Dispatchability & storage.
CSP’s hallmark is thermal energy storage (TES)—typically molten salts—delivering 6–12+ hours of cost‑effective storage for night‑time and peaks. Thermal storage cost per kWh (thermal) is a small fraction of Li‑ion (electrical) costs, enabling multi‑hour firming at utility scale. Next‑gen particle storage targets >700–1000 °C for higher cycle efficiencies. [docs.nrel.gov], [nenpower.com], [art.inl.gov]

3) Industrial heat & hydrogen.
CSP uniquely supplies high‑temperature process heat (≥500–1000 °C) for cement, steel, chemicals and can be integrated with solid‑oxide electrolysis for solar hydrogen—uses critical in desert‑industry zones. SETO targets $0.05/kWh for dispatchable CSP (12+ hrs TES) and $0.02/kWh(th) for heat competitiveness against gas. [energy.gov], [docs.nrel.gov]

4) System services.
Steam/sCO₂ cycles provide inertia, ramping (3–6%/min) and peak‑shaving up to ~80% in Chinese desert bases—services that batteries alone may struggle to deliver over long durations. [asmedigita...n.asme.org]

5) Challenges.

Water: traditional wet cooling is water‑intensive; dry cooling is feasible but efficiency drops; innovations (once‑through where rivers exist) show gains vs. air‑cooling, but desert siting generally implies dry‑cooled designs. [scholar.sun.ac.za]
Precision manufacturing: heliostats can be ~50% of plant cost; supply chains suffer volatile demand, long lead times, and need advanced manufacturing to hit DOE’s $50/m² targets. [docs.nrel.gov], [docs.nrel.gov], [cms2022.so...erence.org]
Reliability: CSP towers face hot‑tank and receiver durability issues; several plants (e.g., Noor III, Crescent Dunes, Cerro Dominador) experienced molten‑salt tank failures or outages; best‑in‑class operations in China show improving generation with learning. [docs.nrel.gov], [solarpaces.nrel.gov], [Dunhuang S...Solar ...]

Lessons from current desert CSP implementations

Morocco (Noor Ouarzazate 580 MW).
The world’s largest CSP complex (trough + tower + TES) proved CSP’s grid‑scale dispatchability. But recent reports highlight technical faults and storage failures in 2024 (months‑long downtime, losses), and Noor Midelt shifts toward PV+battery for cost reasons—illustrating the competitive pressure from PV‑storage. [constructi...online.com], [en.hespress.com], [zawya.com]

China (Gansu/Qinghai—hybrids rising).
China commissioned Akesai Huidong 750 MW hybrid (110 MW CSP tower + 640 MW PV), using CSP for night‑time release and smoothing grid output; Dunhuang 100 MW tower has steadily improved (235 GWh Jan–Nov 2023; longest run 338 hours). China’s 14th FYP positions CSP with mandatory TES, localized supply chains, and multi‑GW pipelines in deserts/Gobi. [pv-magazine.com], [Dunhuang S...Solar ...], [solarpaces.org]

Sahara/Desertec concept—promise vs reality.
Engineering studies reaffirm Sahara’s theoretical potential and HVDC feasibility, but the original Desertec faltered amid costs, politics, permitting, and the rise of cheap PV+storage. Future desert CSP must focus on hybrid value (firm power, heat, services), not commodity electrons alone. [allmultidi...ournal.com], [ryanjhite.com], [desertec.org]

“Every desert installs CSP”: three scenarios

Scenario A — Hybrid CSP‑PV deserts (the pragmatic path)

What happens: Desert regions develop hybrid parks—PV provides low‑cost daytime MWh; CSP towers/troughs with 7–14+ hrs TES deliver post‑sunset peaks, ancillary services, and industrial heat. eTES (electrically heated TES) and sCO₂ cycles further cut costs and raise efficiency. [docs.nrel.gov], [pubs.aip.org]

Impacts:

System value: Firmed renewable portfolios, fewer curtailment events, and reduced gas peakers. Chinese data suggest hybrid designs can generate ~1.7 TWh/yr at scale with smoother profiles. [pv-magazine.com]
Cost: LCOE remains above pure PV but declining with scale, hybridization, and TES advances; CSP targets $0.05/kWh for dispatchable power and $0.02/kWh(th) for heat. [energy.gov]

Risks: Manufacturing scale for heliostats, receiver durability, and financing structures for dispatchable premiums. [docs.nrel.gov], [docs.nrel.gov]

Scenario B — Desert CSP for industrial decarbonization & H₂

What happens: CSP in deserts supplies process heat (500–1000 °C) to cement/steel/chemicals clusters and drives high‑temperature electrolysis for green hydrogen during peak DNI hours, using TES to maintain continuity. [energy.gov], [docs.nrel.gov]

Impacts:

Fuel displacement: Cuts fossil use in hard‑to‑abate sectors; aligns with SETO priorities and global industrial heat demand growth. [energy.gov]
System integration: Shifts CSP from power‑only PPA to heat‑purchase agreements (HPAs) and H₂ offtake, diversifying revenue.

Risks: Customer aggregation, infrastructure (pipelines/heat networks), and high‑temperature materials.

Scenario C — Pure CSP deserts as primary renewable (low feasibility)

What happens: Massive CSP‑only buildouts replace PV/wind.

Why it falls short:

Economics: PV/battery beats CSP on speed and cost; global data show PV’s LCOE at $0.043/kWh versus higher CSP averages. [irena.org]
Scale & finance: Heliostat supply chain, long lead times, and O&M risks inhibit gigawatt‑scale “every desert” rollouts. [heliocon.org]
Resilience: Diversified portfolios (PV, wind, storage, CSP, geothermal) are more robust than a monoculture.

Conclusion: CSP is complementary, not primary; aim for hybridized desert hubs.

India: Rajasthan/Gujarat deserts as CSP‑PV‑storage hubs

Where India stands.
Under the National Solar Mission, India piloted CSP in Rajasthan (Godawari 50 MW trough; Rajasthan Sun Technique 100 MW Fresnel)—demonstrating feasibility but also suboptimal performance versus expectations. India’s solar progress has been overwhelmingly PV, with Rajasthan now ~21 GW installed yet still only a fraction of its potential, highlighting room for dispatchable solar to balance evening demand and industrial loads. [solarpaces.nrel.gov], [climatepol...iative.org], [adb.org], [jgu.edu.in]

Why CSP could be meaningful—for the right use cases.

DNI & land: Rajasthan/Gujarat deserts meet CSP siting criteria; large parks can integrate PV fields + CSP towers + TES. [courses.ems.psu.edu]
Heat & industry: Co‑locate CSP with mining, metals, chemicals, desalination and solar‑steam applications; align with Make‑in‑India industrial corridors. [energy.gov]
Grid services: Dispatchable evening power and inertia support for fast‑growing load (data centers, HVAC peaks). [irena.org]

Design principles for India’s desert CSP hubs (2026–2032)

Hybrid first: Commission pilot hybrid parks (e.g., 100–200 MW CSP with 7–12 h TES + 500–800 MW PV), mirroring China’s Akesai model. The CSP fraction should be sized to deliver post‑sunset blocks and ancillaries. [pv-magazine.com]
Dry cooling by default, water stewardship where feasible: Employ advanced dry coolers (machine‑learning optimized sCO₂ dry‑cooling designs) to minimize water; consider once‑through cooling only where river withdrawals are sustainable (e.g., limited sites). [cds.cern.ch], [scholar.sun.ac.za]
eTES & sCO₂ readiness: Add electrical heaters to charge TES from surplus PV (“eTES”), and evaluate sCO₂ cycles to lift round‑trip efficiency and reduce plant footprint. [docs.nrel.gov], [cms2022.so...erence.org]
Industrial integration: Structure HPAs for process heat and pilot solar‑hydrogen with high‑temperature electrolysis; target clusters near Kutch and western Rajasthan. [docs.nrel.gov]
Performance‑linked procurement: Move beyond simple energy PPAs; use dispatchability‑indexed CfDs (evening blocks, firm capacity, inertia credits). CSP should be paid for attributes, not just MWh. (Global evidence: PV beats on $/MWh; CSP wins on dispatch.) [irena.org]
Supply chain localization: Incentivize heliostat manufacturing and receivers domestically (glass, drives, structures) to cut cost and de‑risk schedules; adopt HelioCon roadmap practices. [docs.nrel.gov]

Economic reality check.
Past Indian CSP tariffs (~₹12.2/kWh for Godawari; high LCOE in Fresnel) are not replicable; PV’s LCOE is now ₹3–3.5/kWh‑equivalent. CSP hubs must therefore monetize systems value (firm, peak, heat). IRENA’s 2024 data show CSP costs falling, but policy must bridge the gap via tariff adders for dispatchability and heat offtake contracts. [solarpaces.nrel.gov], [irena.org]

Global strategy if deserts install CSP at scale

Three enablers:

Hybridization at master‑planning level. Deserts should host multi‑technology parks—PV, CSP+TES, wind (where applicable), utility batteries, and HVDC links—optimized to minimize curtailment and firm evening peaks. China’s “desert, Gobi, arid regions” initiative offers a template. [pv-magazine.com]
Advanced TES & receivers. Scale molten salt towers while piloting particle receivers to push cycles to >700–750 °C for efficiency and industrial integration; mitigate hot‑tank failures via better materials and monitoring. [art.inl.gov], [docs.nrel.gov]
Robust supply chains. De‑risk heliostat manufacturing (cost, precision, wind performance), standardize metrology, and create predictable pipelines to attract factories; DOE/HelioCon roadmaps identify gaps and solutions. [docs.nrel.gov], [heliocon.org]

Why not CSP‑only: Deserts can—and should—host CSP, but PV remains the mass‑scaling backbone because of cost/time‑to‑build. The optimal mix leverages CSP where dispatchable solar heat/power is most valuable. [irena.org]

Risk register & mitigations

Operational reliability: Mitigate receiver/tank failures through materials R&D, thermal cycling management, and PPA designs that reward availability. [docs.nrel.gov]
Water constraints: Default to dry cooling; use machine‑optimized dry cooler designs to minimize efficiency penalties. [cds.cern.ch]
Financing: Structure attribute‑based contracts (firm blocks, heat, inertia); leverage blended finance and development bank support for first projects (ADB case insights). [adb.org]
Supply chain volatility: Lock long‑term heliostat and receiver orders; support domestic manufacturing under industrial policy. [heliocon.org]
Policy drift: Align with COP28 tripling objectives while recognizing CSP’s niche; set clear dispatchability targets and call out thermal‑heat decarbonization pathways. [iea.org]

Call to action (India + global)

For India (Rajasthan/Gujarat):

Two hybrid pilots (CSP+PV+TES, 100–200 MW CSP; 500–800 MW PV) with dry cooling and eTES; performance‑linked CfDs awarding evening firm supply. [pv-magazine.com]
Industrial heat pilot: cement/chemicals cluster with CSP‑steam and SOEC hydrogen demo. [docs.nrel.gov]
Heliostat localization program: standards + incentives per HelioCon roadmaps. [docs.nrel.gov]

Globally (desert regions):

Replicate China’s hybrid approach; treat CSP as dispatchable complement. [pv-magazine.com]
Prioritize TES R&D (particles, thermochemical) to lift temperatures and efficiency; integrate industrial process heat. [art.inl.gov]

Bottom line

“If every desert installed CSP,” the world would gain dispatchable solar power and industrial heat where it matters most—but PV + wind + batteries will still carry the bulk of capacity additions. The winning strategy is hybrid: exploit deserts’ superb DNI to deploy CSP with TES alongside mega‑PV, turning sun‑rich regions into firm, clean energy hubs that run grids after sunset and decarbonize heat. For India, that means Rajasthan/Gujarat hybrid CSP‑PV parks, industrial heat pilots, and attribute‑based procurement that pays for firmness and flexibility, not just kilowatt‑hours. [irena.org], [pv-magazine.com]

Search This Blog

RENEWCONNECT - All about renewables & power sector