What if tidal power became the primary renewable source? [08]

Tidal energy—delivered via tidal barrages/lagoons (tidal‑range) and in‑stream turbines (tidal‑stream)—offers predictable, twice‑daily generation that can complement variable wind and solar. The global installed base remains small (dozens to hundreds of MW) but maturing: the Sihwa Lake (South Korea, 254 MW) and La Rance (France, 240 MW) barrages demonstrate multi‑decadal performance, while the UK/EU pipeline for tidal stream projects is expanding under targeted revenue support. [en.wikipedia.org], [en.wikipedia.org], [oceanenerg...-europe.eu]

Our thesis: Tidal power can play a material role in balanced decarbonization portfolios where site conditions (large tidal ranges or high‑velocity currents), policy frameworks and grid needs align. However, making tidal the primary renewable globally is neither realistic nor desirable: total practical resource is regional, costs remain higher than wind/solar, and environmental trade‑offs (especially for barrages) require careful governance. In India, the Gulf of Khambhat and Gulf of Kutch plus Sundarbans offer the best opportunities, but progress depends on pilot projects, modern tidal‑stream technologies, and tidal hubs integrated with storage and transmission. [royalsocie...ishing.org], [rnd.iitb.ac.in], [prsindia.org]

The power system we’re solving for (2025 reality)

Global electricity demand grew faster than overall energy demand in 2024, with low‑emissions sources meeting most of the increase—but solar provided the largest additions and tidal remains niche. Any plan positioning tidal as “primary” must be reconciled with this demand trajectory, cost, and build‑rates. [iea.org]

Marine energy status: Europe’s ocean‑energy pipeline shows pre‑commercial farms moving toward ~165 MW across 15 projects in five years, driven by grants and Contracts‑for‑Difference (CfD); global cumulative tidal‑stream capacity (operational + decommissioned) is ~35 MW, expected to reach ~188 MW by 2030 if UK/France contracts are delivered. These numbers underline that tidal is still in the hundreds of MW, not gigawatts, today. [oceanenerg...-europe.eu], [royalsocie...ishing.org]

What makes tidal attractive—and what limits it

1) Predictability & grid value.
Tidal is uniquely predictable years ahead (lunar cycles), enabling accurate dispatch planning. Measured data from a 1 MW turbine in the UK shows low short‑term power variability (10–12% at 0.5 Hz) and grid‑side voltage well within acceptable limits—supporting its role in reliability portfolios. [research.b...ngor.ac.uk]

2) Long asset lifetimes & coastal co‑benefits.
La Rance has operated since 1966 with annual generation around 500–600 GWh, illustrating multi‑decadal life; barrages can double as transport links or coastal defenses but require rigorous environmental management. [en.wikipedia.org], [appropedia.org]

3) Environmental and social trade‑offs.
Barrages/lagoons modify sediment transport, salinity, and intertidal habitats, with impacts on fish migration and birds; remediation (fishways, dual‑mode generation) can reduce but not fully eliminate effects. In‑stream turbines have smaller footprint but require robust monitoring for fish/turbine interactions. Recent reviews call for connectivity‑oriented management and adaptive monitoring frameworks. [tethys.pnnl.gov], [nora.nerc.ac.uk]

4) Costs & scalability.
Ocean Energy Systems (IEA‑OES) assessments and recent DOE‑supported analyses indicate current tidal LCOE remains higher than wind/solar, with meaningful reductions expected only via arrays, modular designs, improved O&M, and scaled supply chains. Public support mechanisms (grants/CfDs) are catalyzing that scale‑up in Europe. [ocean-ener...ystems.org], [mhkdr.openei.org]

Technology landscape: tidal‑range vs tidal‑stream

Tidal‑range (barrages/lagoons).

La Rance (France, 240 MW): 24 bulb turbines; annual ~500 GWh; capacity factor ~24%; offers instructive evidence on durability and regional power contribution. [en.wikipedia.org]
Sihwa Lake (Korea, 254 MW): one‑way flood generation; ~552 GWh/year; originally built to address water quality issues, later repurposed for power and ecological restoration. [en.wikipedia.org], [hydropower.org]
UK lagoons: Swansea Bay (320 MW) became a value‑for‑money debate; government analysis in 2018 compared capital cost per unit output unfavorably to offshore wind and Hinkley Point C nuclear, leading to withdrawal of support, though local/regional advocates continue to refine the proposition. [assets.pub...ice.gov.uk], [en.wikipedia.org]

Tidal‑stream (in‑stream turbines).

Emerging arrays (UK, France, Canada) are moving from demos to pre‑commercial with tailored CfDs; industry reports highlight a ~165 MW pipeline and recommended national targets (e.g., UK 1 GW tidal by 2035) as learning curves accelerate. [oceanenerg...-europe.eu], [the-eic.com]
Canada’s Bay of Fundy—home to the world’s highest tides—has renewed momentum: Nova Scotia launched a competitive process for 5–13 MW projects at FORCE, added berths totaling ~16.5 MW, and the federal government committed ~$10 million for environmental monitoring platforms (OSIP) to de‑risk fish interactions. [fundyforce.ca], [news.novascotia.ca], [canada.ca]

Implication: For countries without large estuarine ranges (like France/ROK), tidal‑stream is the more scalable path with lower ecological footprint and faster permitting—but it will likely remain complementary rather than the dominant renewable.

“Primary renewable” scenario testing: can tidal carry the load?

To test viability, we stress three axes:

A. Resource scalability.
A 2025 Royal Society review aggregated ~1,000 TWh/year theoretical tidal‑stream resource across identified sites but derived ~110 TWh/year quasi‑practical across the UK, France, Canada, USA, China and New Zealand—meaning practical extraction is an order of magnitude lower than theoretical and regionally concentrated. This caps tidal‑stream’s plausible national contribution (e.g., UK, Indonesia, NZ show highest relative potential; others are more regional). [royalsocie...ishing.org]

B. Cost trajectories vs alternatives.
Offshore wind and solar PV have established low LCOE and gigawatt‑scale pipelines. Government VfM analyses (e.g., UK’s Swansea lagoon comparison) showed cheaper ways to achieve equivalent energy. While tidal costs can fall with scale, replacing wind/solar as primary would increase system costs and slow decarbonization timelines. [assets.pub...ice.gov.uk]

C. Environmental footprint & social license.
Large barrages/lagoons permanently alter estuarine dynamics; studies emphasize habitat loss risks and call for multi‑criteria siting, dual‑mode operation, and comprehensive fish passage solutions. Scaling barrages to “primary” status would amplify ecosystem trade‑offs beyond acceptable thresholds in many geographies. [tethys.pnnl.gov], [nora.nerc.ac.uk]

Conclusion of scenario test: Tidal’s realistic role is strategic complement, not primary global renewable. It can anchor regional firm renewable where tides are exceptional, and deliver predictable baseload slices plus grid services.

India: what would it take to make tidal meaningful?

Resource & sites.
India’s best tidal opportunities lie on the west coast—Gulf of Khambhat (tidal range up to ~11 m; strong currents), Gulf of Kutch (~8–9 m), and parts of the Sundarbans. IIT Bombay’s modelling reports peak power densities up to ~4,500 W/m² in Khambhat and ~600 W/m² in Kutch, validating strong hydrodynamics for power extraction. [rnd.iitb.ac.in]

Policy status.
India recognises ocean energy (tidal/wave/OTEC) as renewable eligible for non‑solar RPO since Aug 2019; Parliament’s Standing Committee recommended pilot tidal projects and reassessment of exploitable potential and costs, noting prior cancellations due to high capex (e.g., 3.75 MW Sundarbans and 50 MW Gujarat proposals). [pib.gov.in], [prsindia.org]

Cost reality and technology shift.
Earlier concepts leaned toward barrages; recent state discussions suggest a pivot to tidal‑stream (underwater turbines) to avoid blocking rivers and reduce costs—officials in West Bengal have indicated capex/MW has fallen (e.g., “₹30–35 cr/MW” claims) and that new designs avoid hydro‑dam style obstructions; independent verification and competitive tenders are essential before committing scale. [earthjournalism.net]

What a credible India plan looks like (2026–2032)

Launch two pilots—one tidal‑stream, one hybrid lagoon/stream.
- Sites:
  - Khambhat (Mahi/Narmada approaches): multi‑turbine tidal‑stream array (10–20 MW) to validate resource/yield, environmental monitoring, and O&M in silt-laden flows. [researchgate.net]
  - Kutch (outer gulf): smaller lagoon + stream demonstrator (50–100 MW) to test modular seawalls, fish passage, and dual‑mode operations—avoiding full estuary closure. [rnd.iitb.ac.in]
- Mechanisms: dedicated CfD/Feed‑in for tidal, capped exposure; leverage international suppliers (UK/EU) with Make‑in‑India fabrication for towers, foundations, and cables. [oceanenerg...-europe.eu]
Establish tidal hubs with environmental assurance.
- Create Bay study programs akin to Canada’s FORCE/OSIP—deploy autonomous platforms to track fish‑turbine interactions, sediment dynamics, and EMF/noise impacts; integrate Mi’kmaw‑style stakeholder engagement model with local fishing communities. [canada.ca], [marinerenewables.ca]
Grid integration & value stacking.
- Treat tidal as firming resource complementing solar peaks (daytime) and wind variability; use pump storage and battery hybrids; apply firm Renewable procurement guidelines for dispatchable RE (MoP 2023) to contract tidal output blocks. [mnre.gov.in]
- Quantify ancillary services (frequency support, inertia if synchronous machines used) and transmission needs into Gujarat’s coastal grid plans.
Cost-down roadmap.
- Adopt IEA‑OES cost‑reduction levers: array scale, standardized devices, modular O&M, streamlined consenting; publish India‑specific LCOE targets with staged tranches (e.g., Pilots → Pre‑commercial 100–200 MW → Commercial >500 MW). [ocean-ener...ystems.org]
Regulatory clarity & R&D.
- Fund multi‑year environmental impact studies (fishways, biodiversity, geomorphology) as advised by the Standing Committee; reserve R&D grants for tidal‑stream blade/turbine designs resilient to Indian sedimentation and biofouling. [prsindia.org]

Economics: realism over rhetoric

Capex/MW for tidal‑stream varies widely by site and device; international references point to higher LCOE today than wind/solar. Structured pilots under CfD ceilings can internalize learning while avoiding stranded costs. [mhkdr.openei.org]
UK’s Swansea lagoon cost comparison shows that offshore wind could deliver equivalent annual energy at much lower capital cost; India should therefore avoid single mega‑lagoon bets and prioritize modular streams plus hybrid lagoon concepts only where multi‑purpose coastal protection or tourism benefits justify incremental costs. [assets.pub...ice.gov.uk]

Environment & society: license to operate

Barrages can reduce intertidal areas and alter mixing fronts; modelling shows design choices (ebb+flood generation, more turbines) can mitigate mudflat losses relative to lowest‑cost options. India must adopt dual‑mode designs if any lagoon is pursued. [nora.nerc.ac.uk]
Global fish impact literature recommends connectivity, fishways, and adaptive management to restore ecosystem function in systems with tidal barriers; India’s deltaic biodiversity (Sundarbans) warrants a stream‑first approach. [tethys.pnnl.gov]
Continuous monitoring is non‑negotiable; Canada’s OSIP model and Nova Scotia’s procurement show how science‑backed licensing improves investor certainty and protects ecosystems. [canada.ca]

Strategic positioning vs wind/solar

Tidal can be the predictable spine of coastal regions, but not the primary national renewable in India or globally. It should be targeted to:

Firm regional portfolios with predictable output blocks aligned to tidal schedules;
Seasonal balancing, especially where wind lull + solar monsoon effects coincide;
Co‑benefits (coastal protection, tourism, aquaculture) that improve value‑for‑money.

NREL’s integration studies emphasize the need for flexibility and firming in high‑renewables grids; tidal contributes predictability but still needs storage/fast‑ramping assets to handle non‑tidal variability. [docs.nrel.gov]

A realistic “what‑if” headline for India (2032)

If India commissions ~300–500 MW of tidal‑stream across Khambhat/Kutch and a small hybrid lagoon (≤100 MW), while maintaining wind/solar as core, tidal could supply regional firm energy, reduce curtailment (by time‑shifting via storage), and create a domestic marine‑renewables supply chain. This outcome is credible, delivers predictable zero‑carbon MWhs, and respects ecosystem thresholds—without over‑claiming tidal as the primary national renewable. [oceanenerg...-europe.eu], [mnre.gov.in]

CEO/CFO checklist (next 12–24 months)

Choose sites scientifically: independent hydrodynamic modelling + biodiversity screens for Khambhat/Kutch; validate power densities and cable routes. [rnd.iitb.ac.in]
Structure CfD pilots: cap exposure; incorporate availability KPIs and environmental performance clauses; align with firm RE procurement rules. [mnre.gov.in]
Build an OSIP‑style monitoring platform: consortium with academic institutions for continuous fish/turbine interaction data; publish transparent dashboards to secure community buy‑in. [canada.ca]
Plan grid & storage: integrate with pump storage/battery and coastal substations; model tidal schedule dispatch using lunar calendars for day‑ahead planning. [mnre.gov.in]
Communicate benefits & trade‑offs: set expectations on cost vs offshore wind/solar and emphasize tidal’s predictability, lifetimes, and regional resilience. [assets.pub...ice.gov.uk]

Bottom line

Tidal power’s predictability and regional strength make it a valuable part of diversified portfolios—but not the global or national primary renewable. For India, a pragmatic strategy is to pilot and scale tidal‑stream, explore small hybrid lagoons where co‑benefits warrant, embed environmental monitoring, and contract predictability via firm RE procurement. Done right, tidal can become the steady heartbeat of select coastal grids—complementing wind and solar as India moves toward net‑zero.

Search This Blog

RENEWCONNECT - All about renewables & power sector