Improving Auxiliary Power Consumption in Coal-Based Thermal Power Plants: A Path to Tariff Reduction
Introduction
Coal-based thermal power plants (TPPs)
remain a cornerstone of electricity generation in India and many other
countries. Despite the global push toward renewables, coal continues to account
for over 50% of India’s installed capacity. However, one of the persistent
challenges in coal-fired TPPs is Auxiliary Power Consumption (APC), the
energy consumed by internal systems to keep the plant operational. Typically
ranging from 7% to 10% of gross generation, high APC directly impacts
the net power available for sale and, consequently, the tariff.
Reducing APC is not only a technical
necessity but also a strategic imperative to improve plant economics, reduce
emissions, and remain competitive in the evolving energy market.
Understanding Auxiliary Power
Consumption
Auxiliary power refers to the
electricity consumed by various subsystems within the plant, including:
- Boiler Feed Pumps (BFP)
- Induced Draft (ID) Fans
- Forced Draft (FD) Fans
- Primary Air (PA) Fans
- Coal Handling Systems
- Ash Handling Systems
- Cooling Water Pumps
- Lighting and HVAC
The Central Electricity Authority (CEA)
recommends APC norms between 5.75% and 11%, depending on plant size and
configuration
Key Factors Contributing to High APC
- Outdated Equipment: Legacy systems
with low efficiency.
- Poor Maintenance: Leakages, wear
and tear, and fouling.
- Oversized Machinery: Operating
below optimal load.
- Coal Quality: High moisture and ash
content increase fan and pump loads.
- Partial Load Operation: Plants
running below rated capacity consume more auxiliary power per unit of
output.
Strategies to Reduce Auxiliary Power
Consumption
1. Equipment Optimization and Upgrades
- Variable Frequency Drives (VFDs):
Installing VFDs on BFPs, ID, FD, and PA fans allows speed modulation based
on load, saving up to 40% power in some cases.
- Impeller Trimming and De-Staging:
Reduces pump power consumption by matching capacity to actual demand.
- High-Efficiency Motors: Replacing
old motors with IE3/IE4-rated motors improves efficiency.
2. Maintenance and Housekeeping
- Cleaning Air Preheater (APH)
Baskets: Reduces pressure drop and fan loading.
- Duct and Filter Cleaning: Prevents
blockages and improves airflow.
- Leakage Detection and Repair:
Thermographic inspections help identify steam and water leaks.
3. Operational Optimization
- Full Load Operation: APC is lower
at full load; scheduling generation to match peak demand improves
efficiency.
- Combustion Optimization: Adjusting
air-fuel ratios and oxygen levels in flue gas reduces fan power.
- Coal Blending: Using higher-grade
coal or blending improves combustion and reduces fan and mill loads.
4. Design Improvements
- Right-Sizing Equipment: Oversized
fans and pumps consume more power; design optimization is crucial.
- Steam-Driven BFPs: In subcritical
units, switching from electric to steam-driven BFPs can save 2.25% APC.
Technological Innovations
- Digital Twin and AI-Based
Monitoring: Predictive analytics for equipment health and performance.
- Smart Sensors and IoT: Real-time
monitoring of energy consumption and fault detection.
- Advanced Control Systems: Automated
control of combustion, feedwater, and draft systems.
Tariff Reduction Through APC
Optimization
Reducing APC directly increases the net
exportable power, improving revenue and reducing the per-unit cost of
generation. Here's how:
1. Increased Revenue
- More power available for sale at
the same fuel input.
- Better plant load factor (PLF)
improves financial metrics.
2. Lower Fuel Cost per Unit
- Efficient operation reduces coal
consumption per MWh.
- Less wear and tear on equipment
reduces maintenance costs.
3. Compliance and Incentives
- Meeting CEA norms avoids penalties.
- Eligible for performance-based
incentives under regulatory frameworks.
Case Study Highlights
- 500 MW Unit with VFD on ID Fan:
Reduced power input from 1436.9 kW to 867.15 kW with increased flue gas
flow
- Steam vs. Electric BFP:
Steam-driven BFPs showed a 2.25% reduction in APC compared to
electric motor-driven ones.
Conclusion
Reducing auxiliary power consumption in
coal-based thermal power plants is a multi-dimensional challenge that requires
a blend of technological upgrades, operational excellence, and strategic
planning. With rising fuel costs and competitive tariffs, optimizing APC is no
longer optional—it is essential for survival and growth.
By adopting best practices and investing in energy-efficient technologies, TPPs can significantly reduce their cost of generation, improve profitability, and contribute to a cleaner energy future.
Comments
Post a Comment